BIRMINGHAM, Ala.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--
Regions Financial Corporation (NYSE:RF) today announced earnings for the
first quarter of 2015. The company reported net income available to
common shareholders of $218 million and earnings per diluted share of
$0.16.
"Diversifying revenue, generating positive operating leverage and
effectively deploying capital are top priorities for our company, and
our first quarter results illustrate that we are successfully executing
on our strategy," said Grayson Hall, chairman, president and CEO.
"Regions achieved positive operating leverage, grew important sources of
non-interest income in the wealth management and mortgage businesses and
reduced expenses on an adjusted(1) basis."
"In an increasingly competitive and extended low interest rate
environment, Regions achieved steady growth in loans and deposits
compared to the prior quarter as our associates continued to focus on
meeting more customer needs," continued Hall. "During the first quarter,
Regions was again recognized by leading customer experience research
firms the Temkin Group and Greenwich Associates for providing
industry-leading service to both consumers and businesses in 2014."
"We also reaffirmed our commitment to managing our capital prudently and
investing in our business to support long-term growth objectives while
also increasing returns to shareholders," added Hall. "Our successful
completion of the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR)
highlights our continued long-term approach to capital allocation and
distribution as returning excess capital to shareholders remains a
priority."
SUMMARY OF FIRST QUARTER 2015 RESULTS:
First quarter 2015 results compared to first
quarter 2014:
-
Ending loans totaled $78 billion, an increase of $2.6 billion or 3
percent as production increased 11 percent.
-
Business lending ending balances increased 4 percent as production
increased 8 percent.
-
Consumer lending ending balances increased 2 percent as production
increased 30 percent.
-
Ending deposit balances totaled $97 billion, an increase of $4 billion
or 4 percent as low-cost deposits increased 6 percent.
-
Net interest income was relatively stable at $815 million despite the
impact on asset yields resulting from a continued low interest rate
environment; however, net interest margin declined 8 basis points.
-
Non-interest income increased 3 percent driven by growth in wealth
management, capital markets and credit card revenues, but were
partially offset by economic and regulatory headwinds that reduced
total service charges. Revenue was also impacted from a product
discontinuation, which reduced income by $9 million.
-
Non-interest expenses increased in part due to branch optimization and
debt management expenses in the first quarter of 2015, as well as
gains on the sale of troubled debt restructured loans (TDRs) recorded
in the prior year. Excluding these items, adjusted non-interest
expenses(1) improved 1 percent, and the adjusted efficiency
ratio(1) improved 100 basis points.
-
Credit quality improved as net charge-offs declined 34 percent,
representing 0.28 percent of average loans, and non-performing loans
(excluding loans held for sale) declined 25 percent.
First quarter 2015 results compared to fourth
quarter 2014:
-
Ending loans increased $936 million or 1 percent.
-
Business lending ending balances increased 2 percent.
-
Consumer lending ending balances were flat, while production
increased 9 percent.
-
Ending deposit balances increased 3 percent as the low-cost deposits
component increased 4 percent.
-
Net interest income declined 1 percent due to fewer days in the
quarter and continued low interest rates, but was partially offset by
the benefit from loan growth; however, net interest margin improved 1
basis point to 3.18 percent.
-
Non-interest income totaled $470 million, a decline of 1 percent as
growth in mortgage and wealth management revenue was offset by lower
service charges, security gains, and net revenue from affordable
housing.
-
Non-interest expenses totaled $905 million or $840 million on an
adjusted basis,(1) a decline of 2 percent as professional,
legal and regulatory expenses, as well as outside services expense
declined.
-
Credit quality improved as net charge-offs declined 35 percent, and
non-performing loans (excluding loans held for sale) declined 3
percent.
-
Capital and liquidity remained strong as the fully phased-in pro-forma
Common Equity Tier 1 ratio(1)(2)(3) was 10.9 percent, and
the loan to deposit ratio was 80 percent.
FIRST QUARTER 2015 FINANCIAL RESULTS:
Significant items impacting earnings
During the first quarter of 2014, the company recorded a pre-tax benefit
of $35 million related to loans that were transferred to held-for-sale,
reflecting lower related expenses than originally estimated.
As previously disclosed, in the fourth quarter of 2014 the company
elected to consolidate 50 branches throughout 2015 as part of an ongoing
evaluation of the branch network. Related to these branch
consolidations, the company recorded $10 million of expense in the
fourth quarter and an additional $13 million in the first quarter of
2015, as well as an additional $9 million of expenses related to
occupancy optimization.
During the fourth quarter of 2014 the company recorded an accrual of
$100 million for contingent legal and regulatory items related to
previously disclosed matters.
During the first quarter of 2015, the company redeemed $250 million of
7.50 percent subordinated notes. Future net income will benefit from
lower funding costs due to the redemption of these higher cost
liabilities; however, extinguishment charges associated with the
redemption increased non-interest expense by $43 million.
Additionally during the first quarter of 2015, tax expense benefited
from a state deferred tax adjustment, which reduced income tax expenses
by $10 million.
Total revenue
Net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis was $832
million, a decline of $5 million or 1 percent from the previous quarter.
The decline was driven primarily by fewer days in the quarter and the
impact of the low interest rate environment on loan yields, partially
offset by higher outstanding loan balances. The net interest margin
increased 1 basis point from the fourth quarter to 3.18 percent and
benefited from the redemption of higher-cost debt, partially offset by
higher cash balances.
Non-interest income totaled $470 million in the first quarter, a decline
of $4 million or 1 percent from the fourth quarter. Service charges
declined $6 million, primarily driven by a $3 million reduction of fees
resulting from a product discontinuation during the fourth quarter.
Additionally, other non-interest income declined due to gains on the
sale of affordable housing investments during the fourth quarter.
However, this was partially offset by mortgage fees which increased $13
million or 48 percent, driven by an increase in refinancing activity and
improved valuations from the mortgage servicing rights and related
hedge. Additionally, wealth management revenues increased $7 million or
8 percent, as fees from insurance, investment management and trust and
investment services all increased.
Non-interest expenses
Total non-interest expenses declined 2 percent on an adjusted(1)
basis from the previous quarter, as many expense categories declined.
Professional, legal, and regulatory expenses declined 86 percent or 44
percent excluding the legal and regulatory accrual in the fourth
quarter. The quarter over quarter decline, excluding the fourth quarter
accrual, was a result of lower third-party legal and consulting costs in
the first quarter. Additionally, lower third-party spend resulted in a
16 percent decline in outside services expense. Salaries and benefits
remained relatively flat as seasonal increases in payroll taxes were
offset by lower incentives. The company remained focused on achieving
operational efficiencies and reduced the adjusted efficiency ratio(1)
120 basis points to 64.9 percent.
Income taxes
The effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2015 was 28.7
percent. The effective rate for the quarter reflects the impact of the
adoption of new accounting guidance related to the accounting for
investments in qualified affordable housing projects, as well as the
impact of an adjustment to certain state deferred taxes. Excluding the
impact of the adjustment to the state deferred tax assets, the effective
tax rate was approximately 31.7 percent. All prior periods have been
adjusted to conform to the new accounting guidance.
Loans
Total loan balances were $78 billion at the end of the quarter, an
increase of $936 million or 1 percent from the previous quarter.
Importantly, this growth was broad-based among product lines. The
business lending portfolio totaled $49 billion at the end of the
quarter, an increase of $867 million or 2 percent. Total commercial
loans increased $759 million or 2 percent, and investor real estate
loans also increased 2 percent. Line utilization increased 10 basis
points to 45.4 percent and commitments for new loans increased 4 percent
from the previous quarter.
The consumer lending portfolio totaled $29 billion at the end of the
quarter and was flat with the prior quarter. Mortgage balances increased
1 percent driven by a 9 percent increase in production. Indirect auto
lending continued to expand as balances increased $59 million or 2
percent from the previous quarter. Other consumer loans increased 2
percent from the fourth quarter as consumers took advantage of expanded
product offerings. However, these increases were offset by declines in
home equity and credit card balances of 1 percent and 4 percent,
respectively.
Deposits
Total ending deposit balances were $97 billion, an increase of $3
billion or 3 percent from the prior quarter. Regions continues to
improve the mix of deposits as low-cost deposits increased $3 billion in
the quarter, while higher cost certificates of deposit declined $206
million. Low-cost deposits represented 91 percent of deposits at the end
of the first quarter. Deposit costs remained near historical lows at 12
basis points in the first quarter while total funding costs were 29
basis points.
Asset quality
Regions maintained solid asset quality and risk discipline in the first
quarter. Net charge-offs declined $29 million or 35 percent to $54
million. This represented 0.28 percent of average loans, which is the
lowest level since the third quarter of 2007. The provision for loan
losses was $49 million and the resulting allowance for loan and lease
losses was 1.40 percent of total loans outstanding at the end of the
quarter.
Non-performing loans (excluding loans held for sale) declined to $800
million, or 3 percent from the prior quarter. In addition, total
delinquencies declined 12 percent and troubled debt restructured loans
declined 5 percent. Total commercial and investor real estate criticized
and classified loans increased from the prior quarter as the company
experienced some weakening in a small number of larger dollar commercial
and industrial loans within the energy related, healthcare and other
portfolios. However, the improvement in the consumer lending portfolio
was noteworthy as net charge-offs, delinquencies and non-performing
loans all declined. Given the current phase of the credit cycle,
volatility in certain credit metrics is to be expected.
Capital and liquidity
During the first quarter, the company repurchased $102 million of common
stock, completing the availability pursuant to its previously disclosed
$350 million share repurchase program. The company also paid $67 million
in dividends to common shareholders in the first quarter.
Additionally, during the first quarter, Regions completed the annual
Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) process and received no
objection regarding planned capital actions. These actions include
increasing the quarterly dividend to $0.06 per common share and the
repurchase of up to $875 million in common shares over the next five
quarters. Subject to approval by the Board of Directors, these actions
are expected to be effective beginning with the quarterly dividend to be
paid in July 2015.
Regions began the transition period for the Basel III capital rules in
the first quarter. As such, the company will report Basel III capital
ratios under the phase-in provisions for regulatory reporting purposes,
but will also continue to report its Common Equity Tier 1 ratio as if
fully implemented. Under these new provisions, Regions' capital position
remained strong as the Tier 1(2)(3)(4) and Common Equity Tier
1(2) ratios were estimated at 12.0 percent 11.2 percent,
respectively, at quarter-end under the phase-in provisions. In addition,
the Common Equity Tier 1 ratio(1)(2)(3) was estimated at 10.9
percent on a fully phased-in basis.
The company's liquidity position remained solid, as the loan to deposit
ratio at the end of the quarter was 80 percent. The company remains well
positioned as it relates to the final liquidity coverage ratio rule and
expects to be fully compliant by the January 2016 deadline.
About Regions Financial Corporation
Regions Financial Corporation (NYSE:RF), with $122 billion in assets, is
a member of the S&P 500 Index and is one of the nation's largest
full-service providers of consumer and commercial banking, wealth
management, mortgage, and insurance products and services. Regions
serves customers in 16 states across the South, Midwest and Texas, and
through its subsidiary, Regions Bank, operates approximately 1,650
banking offices and 2,000 ATMs. Additional information about Regions and
its full line of products and services can be found at www.regions.com.
Forward-Looking Statements
This release may include forward-looking statements as defined in the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which reflect Regions'
current views with respect to future events and financial performance.
Forward-looking statements are not based on historical information, but
rather are related to future operations, strategies, financial results
or other developments. Forward-looking statements are based on
management's expectations as well as certain assumptions and estimates
made by, and information available to, management at the time the
statements are made. Those statements are based on general assumptions
and are subject to various risks, uncertainties and other factors that
may cause actual results to differ materially from the views, beliefs
and projections expressed in such statements. These risks, uncertainties
and other factors include, but are not limited to, those described below:
-
Current and future economic and market conditions in the United States
generally or in the communities we serve, including the effects of
declines in property values, unemployment rates and potential
reductions of economic growth, which may adversely affect our lending
and other businesses and our financial results and conditions.
-
Possible changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies of, and other
activities undertaken by, governments, agencies, central banks and
similar organizations, which could have a material adverse effect on
our earnings.
-
The effects of a possible downgrade in the U.S. government's sovereign
credit rating or outlook, which could result in risks to us and
general economic conditions that we are not able to predict.
-
Possible changes in market interest rates or capital markets could
adversely affect our revenue and expense, the value of assets and
obligations, and the availability and cost of capital and liquidity.
-
Any impairment of our goodwill or other intangibles, or any adjustment
of valuation allowances on our deferred tax assets due to adverse
changes in the economic environment, declining operations of the
reporting unit, or other factors.
-
Possible changes in the creditworthiness of customers and the possible
impairment of the collectability of loans.
-
Changes in the speed of loan prepayments, loan origination and sale
volumes, charge-offs, loan loss provisions or actual loan losses where
our allowance for loan losses may not be adequate to cover our
eventual losses.
-
Possible acceleration of prepayments on mortgage-backed securities due
to low interest rates, and the related acceleration of premium
amortization on those securities.
-
Our ability to effectively compete with other financial services
companies, some of whom possess greater financial resources than we do
and are subject to different regulatory standards than we are.
-
Loss of customer checking and savings account deposits as customers
pursue other, higher-yield investments, which could increase our
funding costs.
-
Our inability to develop and gain acceptance from current and
prospective customers for new products and services in a timely manner
could have a negative impact on our revenue.
-
Changes in laws and regulations affecting our businesses, such as the
Dodd-Frank Act and other legislation and regulations relating to bank
products and services, as well as changes in the enforcement and
interpretation of such laws and regulations by applicable governmental
and self-regulatory agencies, which could require us to change certain
business practices, increase compliance risk, reduce our revenue,
impose additional costs on us, or otherwise negatively affect our
businesses.
-
Our ability to obtain no regulatory objection (as part of the
comprehensive capital analysis and review ("CCAR") process or
otherwise) to take certain capital actions, including paying dividends
and any plans to increase common stock dividends, repurchase common
stock under current or future programs, or redeem preferred stock or
other regulatory capital instruments, may impact our ability to return
capital to stockholders and market perceptions of us.
-
Our ability to comply with applicable capital and liquidity
requirements (including the finalized Basel III capital standards),
including our ability to generate capital internally or raise capital
on favorable terms, and if we fail to meet requirements, our financial
condition could be negatively impacted.
-
The costs, including possibly incurring fines, penalties, or other
negative effects (including reputational harm) of any adverse
judicial, administrative, or arbitral rulings or proceedings,
regulatory enforcement actions, or other legal actions to which we or
any of our subsidiaries are a party, and which may adversely affect
our results.
-
Our ability to manage fluctuations in the value of assets and
liabilities and off-balance sheet exposure so as to maintain
sufficient capital and liquidity to support our business.
-
Possible changes in consumer and business spending and saving habits
and the related effect on our ability to increase assets and to
attract deposits, which could adversely affect our net income.
-
Any inaccurate or incomplete information provided to us by our
customers or counterparties.
-
Inability of our framework to manage risks associated with our
business such as credit risk and operational risk, including
third-party vendors and other service providers, which could, among
other things, result in a breach of operating or security systems as a
result of a cyber attack or similar act.
-
The inability of our internal disclosure controls and procedures to
prevent, detect or mitigate any material errors or fraudulent acts.
-
The effects of geopolitical instability, including wars, conflicts and
terrorist attacks and the potential impact, directly or indirectly on
our businesses.
-
The effects of man-made and natural disasters, including fires,
floods, droughts, tornadoes, hurricanes, and environmental damage,
which may negatively affect our operations and/or our loan portfolios
and increase our cost of conducting business.
-
Our inability to keep pace with technological changes could result in
losing business to competitors.
-
Our ability to identify and address cyber-security risks such as data
security breaches, "denial of service" attacks, "hacking" and identity
theft, a failure of which could disrupt our business and result in the
disclosure of and/or misuse or misappropriation of confidential or
proprietary information; increased costs; losses; or adverse effects
to our reputation.
-
Possible downgrades in our credit ratings or outlook could increase
the costs of funding from capital markets.
-
The effects of problems encountered by other financial institutions
that adversely affect us or the banking industry generally could
require us to change certain business practices, reduce our revenue,
impose additional costs on us, or otherwise negatively affect our
businesses.
-
The effects of the failure of any component of our business
infrastructure provided by a third party could disrupt our businesses;
result in the disclosure of and/or misuse of confidential information
or proprietary information; increase our costs; negatively affect our
reputation; and cause losses.
-
Our ability to receive dividends from our subsidiaries could affect
our liquidity and ability to pay dividends to stockholders.
-
Changes in accounting policies or procedures as may be required by the
Financial Accounting Standards Board or other regulatory agencies
could materially affect how we report our financial results.
-
The effects of any damage to our reputation resulting from
developments related to any of the items identified above.
Forward-Looking Statements (Continued)
The foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive. For discussion of these
and other factors that may cause actual results to differ from
expectations, look under the captions "Forward-Looking Statements" and
"Risk Factors" of Regions' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The words "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "seeks," "believes,"
"estimates," "expects," "targets," "projects," "outlook," "forecast,"
"will," "may," "could," "should," "can," and similar expressions often
signify forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance
on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.
We assume no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking
statements that are made from time to time.
Regions' Investor Relations contacts are List Underwood and Dana Nolan
at (205) 581-7890; Regions' Media contact is Evelyn Mitchell at (205)
264-4551.
Use of non-GAAP financial measures
Management uses the adjusted efficiency ratio (non-GAAP) and the
adjusted fee income ratio (non-GAAP) to monitor performance and believes
these measures provide meaningful information to investors. Non-interest
expense (GAAP) is presented excluding certain adjustments to arrive at
adjusted non-interest expense (non-GAAP), which is the numerator for the
efficiency ratio. Non-interest income (GAAP) is presented excluding
certain adjustments to arrive at adjusted non-interest income
(non-GAAP), which is the numerator for the fee income ratio. Net
interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis and non-interest income
are added together to arrive at total revenue on a taxable-equivalent
basis. Adjustments are made to arrive at adjusted total revenue on a
taxable-equivalent basis (non-GAAP), which is the denominator for the
fee income and efficiency ratios. Regions believes that the exclusion of
these adjustments provides a meaningful base for period-to-period
comparisons, which management believes will assist investors in
analyzing the operating results of the Company and predicting future
performance. These non-GAAP financial measures are also used by
management to assess the performance of Regions' business. It is
possible that the activities related to the adjustments may recur;
however, management does not consider the activities related to the
adjustments to be indications of ongoing operations. Regions believes
that presentation of these non-GAAP financial measures will permit
investors to assess the performance of the Company on the same basis as
that applied by management.
Tangible common stockholders' equity ratios have become a focus of some
investors and management believes they may assist investors in analyzing
the capital position of the Company absent the effects of intangible
assets and preferred stock. Analysts and banking regulators have
assessed Regions' capital adequacy using the tangible common
stockholders' equity measure. Because tangible common stockholders'
equity is not formally defined by GAAP or prescribed in any amount by
federal banking regulations it is currently considered to be a non-GAAP
financial measure and other entities may calculate it differently than
Regions' disclosed calculations. Since analysts and banking regulators
may assess Regions' capital adequacy using tangible common stockholders'
equity, management believes that it is useful to provide investors the
ability to assess Regions' capital adequacy on this same basis.
The calculation of the fully phased-in pro-forma "Common equity Tier 1"
(CET1) is based on Regions' understanding of the Final Basel III
requirements. For Regions, the Basel III framework became effective on a
phased-in approach starting in 2015 with full implementation beginning
in 2019. The calculation includes estimated pro-forma amounts for the
ratio on a fully phased-in basis. Regions' current understanding of the
final framework includes certain assumptions, including the Company's
interpretation of the requirements, and informal feedback received
through the regulatory process. Regions' understanding of the framework
is evolving and will likely change as analysis and discussions with
regulators continue. Because Regions is not currently subject to the
fully-phased in capital rules, this pro-forma measure is considered to
be a non-GAAP financial measure, and other entities may calculate it
differently from Regions' disclosed calculation.
A company's regulatory capital is often expressed as a percentage of
risk-weighted assets. Under the risk-based capital framework, a
company's balance sheet assets and credit equivalent amounts of
off-balance sheet items are assigned to broad risk categories. The
aggregated dollar amount in each category is then multiplied by the
prescribed risk-weighted percentage. The resulting weighted values from
each of the categories are added together and this sum is the
risk-weighted assets total that, as adjusted, comprises the denominator
of certain risk-based capital ratios. Common equity Tier 1 capital is
then divided by this denominator (risk-weighted assets) to determine the
common equity Tier 1 capital ratio. The amounts disclosed as
risk-weighted assets are calculated consistent with banking regulatory
requirements on a fully phased-in basis.
Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required
to be uniformly applied and are not audited. Although these non-GAAP
financial measures are frequently used by stakeholders in the evaluation
of a company, they have limitations as analytical tools, and should not
be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for analyses of results
as reported under GAAP. In particular, a measure of earnings that
excludes selected items does not represent the amount that effectively
accrues directly to stockholders.
Management and the Board of Directors utilize non-GAAP measures as
follows:
-
Preparation of Regions' operating budgets
-
Monthly financial performance reporting
-
Monthly close-out reporting of consolidated results (management only)
-
Presentation to investors of company performance

Photos/Multimedia Gallery Available: http://www.businesswire.com/multimedia/home/20150421005139/en/
Regions Financial Corporation
Media Contact:
Evelyn
Mitchell, 205-264-4551
or
Investor Relations Contact:
List
Underwood or Dana Nolan, 205-581-7890
Source: Regions Financial Corporation
News Provided by Acquire Media